Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Module 2: Cognitivism (Finley's Response)

One thing that I find evident from each of the posts is that no one learning theory is the definitive acceptable way in which humans learn. In terms of Bloom’s taxonomy, behaviorism supports lower level thought processes including knowledge and comprehension (Kapp, 2007). Cognitivism is not seen truly as a supporter of higher thought processes; however, it is thought to support thinking skills such as application and analysis.

Despite the fact that learning is thought to be an internal process, it is the outward display of how the knowledge is transferred to situations that is seen as evidence of information learned. According to Saettler, the following factors contributed to the emergence of cognitive theory over behaviorist theory (2004, p. 321):
“First, the development of the information processing approach that grew out of information theory…second, the impact of the computer, which provided an effective way to simulate human behavior and gave rise to a new subfield called artificial intelligence; third, in the field of linguistics, there was a dramatic shift from behaviorists theories of language toward an analysis of the structures underlying comprehension and production of utterance; and fourth, the theory and research of Jean Piaget had a profound influence on cognitive developmental psychology…”

For more information on cognitivism, please visit the following websites:

http://www.learning-theories.com/cognitivism.html

http://personal.psu.edu/users/w/x/wxh139/cognitive_1.htm

http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/brenda.htm

Additionally, check out this video with both behaviorism and cognitivism summarized:


Taken from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vq9XIrNGgoQ

References
Kerr, B. (2007). __isms as filter, not blinker. Retrieved March 31, 2010 from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html

Kapp, K. (2007). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought. Retrieved March 31, 2010 from http://karlkapp.blogspot.com/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational.html

Saettler, P. (2004) The evolution of American educational technology (2nd ed.). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Zalaquett, C. & Gomes, N. (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy pyramid. Retrieved March 31, 2010 from http://www.c21te.usf.edu/materials/institute/ct/index4.html

2 comments:

  1. Angela,

    I can see your point about Blooms taxonomy! No one learning theory can do it! It takes multiple learning theories to get from the bottom to the top of the scale and reach higher order thinking skills. I must say the first picture you get in the video is rather freaky! Why would anyone subject themselves to that?:) I liked the video on Behaviorism I liked how it gave the teachers suggestions!

    Sherry Breeden

    ReplyDelete
  2. Angela,

    Your posts are awesome! I love the way you incorporate many other media outlets. I tend to agree with the blogs that I read - I definitely feel that everyone benefits from using all learning styles in the classroom. While I believe students should understand the concept, memorization plays a huge part, also. For example, I want my students to not only memorize the formula for finding the circumference of a circle, I want them to understand why it works, etc.

    Great posts!
    Holly

    ReplyDelete